Monday, February 29, 2016



A Fear of Flying

Terrain,  Weather ,Planes or Airports?

Every time there is an air crash in Nepal, a lot of theories, accusations and counter accusations make the rounds in local media .The international media have only one theory-The most dangerous and most challenging airports in the world, and frightening air safety standards.
There were 2 air crashes within 2 days last week in Nepal, and it actually might seem superfluous of me to write about it. I am neither an airline pilot nor an air safety expert-but I have travelled on a lot of planes starting from a   Vintage World War 2 DC 3, the DH Twin Otter, the Pilatus Porter and Cessna within Nepal, and I did feel I was risking my life a few times.
A few of the flights I have been on will always be etched in my memory-and they do not involve the relatively comfortable commercial air travel we undertake now. Apart from travelling in a DC 3 from Bhairahawa to Surkhet (yes, they actually had other airports as hubs in the 70s) all of the other trips within Nepal were made in STOL (Short Take Off and Landing) aircraft, to airstrips and airports that are far more challenging than the standard “world’s most dangerous” tarmacked Lukla  Airstrip, or even Kathmandu’s TIA.
Photograph of  Everest,Lhotse and Amadablam from a Pilatus Porter
Note the open aircraft door. 
In 1975,around the time the Japanese women’s’ Everest expedition was on their final assault of Everest, I was on a single- engined plane flying into lots of clouds en route to Syangboche(3,780m/12,400 ft.), the highest placed airstrip in the world at the time. The pilot was  the legendary Emil Wick, and the passengers were a motley bunch. A Japanese photographer was harnessed to the seat with the aircraft door open!  A world famous geographer  (who would perish in a helicopter crash many years later) was laughing at his wife who had her eyes tightly shut as the little Pilatus aircraft bucked and swooped, and she was holding on tight to me. Being very young, I thought it was a great roller coaster ride, and Emil flew dangerously close to the ‘rocks in the clouds”. A Sherpa, Ang Dorjee, who had never flown before, was alternately laughing and crying. The cargo consisted of a very large number of oxygen cylinders and other mountaineering equipment. It was a thrilling ride at the time, and there was no guarantee whether we would even be able to land .They might have followed flight rules, but all the other rules were being broken. It would save 3-4 days to ferry all the equipment and people from Namche Bazar and Lukla.That same year, Sir Edmund Hillary would lose his wife Louise and daughter in an air crash en route to Phaplu from Kathmandu.
Snowed out in Syangboche Airstrip
The other flight I remember vividly was one from Biratnagar to Tumlingtar to Lamidanda and then on to Kathmandu in a DHC Twin Otter aircraft. Tumlingtar airport lies in the Trans Himalayan Arun River Valley and it was monsoon already. The slush on the dirt runway  made the aircraft swing wildly while taking off .Being older,  I was more afraid than ever, and vowed to walk for  a week instead of flying in STOL aircraft again.
Most of the Airstrips in Nepal are challenging to say the least, carved in mountains and valleys, servicing areas that would takes days and even weeks to travel by road or by foot.  They range in length from 1400 ft in Doti to 2200 ft in Jomsom and altitudes of 1555 in Ramechhap to 12,297ft  in Syangboche. Flights from Pokhara to Jomsom ,which have seen a number of crashes like the one last week, in which 23 passengers and crew perished, take only 20 minutes and save 2-3 days of travel.

Most of the STOL Airfields cannot be classified as such; they should be classified as ALTIPORTS-with a steep gradient runway and only one approach for takeoff and landing. They cannot be classified according to international aviation safety standards.
The aeroplanes involved in the crashes have an excellent safety record outside of Nepal. The sturdy, low maintenance De Havilland Twin Otter DHC 6-400 has had its reputation destroyed in Nepal.Outside of Nepal, it has a reputation of safely landing in spite of engine failure,  is highly maneuverable, and can be flown slowly (150-300 km per hour).Out of the 25 Twin Otters  that were   operated at different times in Nepal,22 have crashed .Most of the crashes read like Jomsom- Lukla- Jomsom, and it is not just pilot error or controlled flight into terrain. It is also the topography and the weather. The 12% incline of the Lukla airport may  be one thing, but overloading,  pilot overconfidence, unpredictable weather and high mountains  are  also definitely factors that contribute to the hazards.
Lukla Airport ,the world's most "dangerous" airport.
A few years ago, It was actually a relief to walk back to Beni en route  to Pokhara when my flight from Jomsom got cancelled because of bad weather. I wouldn’t like to take a chance on a 20- minute flight, which the winds roaring  down and small rocks flying by through the Kali Gandaki River gorge. Even when the weather was clear on both sides, that small 20 minute flight could run into bad weather and poor visibility because of the microclimates existing in such terrain.
There is also a hue and cry over the 2008 decision to allow single engine aircraft to operate in Nepal, after a hiatus of almost 2 decades. The Pilatus Porter aircraft and other similar single engine aircraft like the Cessna were being flown right from the 1960s in Nepal. In western Nepal, it is economical and saves several days of travel along equally hazardous roads. The only consolation would be that if a bus or jeep tumbles down a treacherous road, there might be a few more survivors.
The Civil Aviation Authority  of Nepal -CAAN has a detailed listing of STOL ports, Altiports, grading of airports and stringent requirements for pilots to graduate to difficult airports. I wonder If the rules are being strictly followed, and I am certain that the on -ground equipment , like the rest of the government machinery is sub-par at best.
The argument here should be that instead of banning single engine or twin engine STOL aircraft, or declaring an airport “the most dangerous” or not allowing passengers to fly at all, we should improve instrumental and airport  infrastructure, introduce stringent  visual  flight rules ,regulate payload, and ensure that pilots can identify open fields to land in in case of single engine failure like the one that claimed the lives of the 2 pilots in the  Pacific Aerospace plane flown by Air Kashtamandap.
For now, I’m mulling over which route would  be safer for a  great adventure to the  Everest Base Camp , Rara Lake or  Upper Mustang. Maybe I’ll write a will and fly after the ban has been lifted… Or write a will and drive/walk… Either way, my fear of flying is well founded for now!