A Fear of Flying
Terrain, Weather ,Planes or Airports?
Every time there is an air crash in Nepal, a lot of theories, accusations and counter accusations make the rounds in local media .The international media have only one theory-The most dangerous and most challenging airports in the world, and frightening air safety standards.Terrain, Weather ,Planes or Airports?
There were 2 air crashes within 2 days last week in Nepal, and it actually might seem superfluous of me to write about it. I am neither an airline pilot nor an air safety expert-but I have travelled on a lot of planes starting from a Vintage World War 2 DC 3, the DH Twin Otter, the Pilatus Porter and Cessna within Nepal, and I did feel I was risking my life a few times.
A few of the flights I have been on will always be etched in my memory-and they do not involve the relatively comfortable commercial air travel we undertake now. Apart from travelling in a DC 3 from Bhairahawa to Surkhet (yes, they actually had other airports as hubs in the 70s) all of the other trips within Nepal were made in STOL (Short Take Off and Landing) aircraft, to airstrips and airports that are far more challenging than the standard “world’s most dangerous” tarmacked Lukla Airstrip, or even Kathmandu’s TIA.
![]() |
Photograph of Everest,Lhotse and Amadablam from a Pilatus Porter Note the open aircraft door. |
![]() |
Snowed out in Syangboche Airstrip |
Most of the Airstrips in Nepal are challenging to say the least, carved in mountains and valleys, servicing areas that would takes days and even weeks to travel by road or by foot. They range in length from 1400 ft in Doti to 2200 ft in Jomsom and altitudes of 1555 in Ramechhap to 12,297ft in Syangboche. Flights from Pokhara to Jomsom ,which have seen a number of crashes like the one last week, in which 23 passengers and crew perished, take only 20 minutes and save 2-3 days of travel.
Most of the STOL Airfields cannot be classified as such; they should be classified as ALTIPORTS-with a steep gradient runway and only one approach for takeoff and landing. They cannot be classified according to international aviation safety standards.
The aeroplanes involved in the crashes have an excellent safety record outside of Nepal. The sturdy, low maintenance De Havilland Twin Otter DHC 6-400 has had its reputation destroyed in Nepal.Outside of Nepal, it has a reputation of safely landing in spite of engine failure, is highly maneuverable, and can be flown slowly (150-300 km per hour).Out of the 25 Twin Otters that were operated at different times in Nepal,22 have crashed .Most of the crashes read like Jomsom- Lukla- Jomsom, and it is not just pilot error or controlled flight into terrain. It is also the topography and the weather. The 12% incline of the Lukla airport may be one thing, but overloading, pilot overconfidence, unpredictable weather and high mountains are also definitely factors that contribute to the hazards.
![]() |
Lukla Airport ,the world's most "dangerous" airport. |
There is also a hue and cry over the 2008 decision to allow single engine aircraft to operate in Nepal, after a hiatus of almost 2 decades. The Pilatus Porter aircraft and other similar single engine aircraft like the Cessna were being flown right from the 1960s in Nepal. In western Nepal, it is economical and saves several days of travel along equally hazardous roads. The only consolation would be that if a bus or jeep tumbles down a treacherous road, there might be a few more survivors.
The Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal -CAAN has a detailed listing of STOL ports, Altiports, grading of airports and stringent requirements for pilots to graduate to difficult airports. I wonder If the rules are being strictly followed, and I am certain that the on -ground equipment , like the rest of the government machinery is sub-par at best.
The argument here should be that instead of banning single engine or twin engine STOL aircraft, or declaring an airport “the most dangerous” or not allowing passengers to fly at all, we should improve instrumental and airport infrastructure, introduce stringent visual flight rules ,regulate payload, and ensure that pilots can identify open fields to land in in case of single engine failure like the one that claimed the lives of the 2 pilots in the Pacific Aerospace plane flown by Air Kashtamandap.
For now, I’m mulling over which route would be safer for a great adventure to the Everest Base Camp , Rara Lake or Upper Mustang. Maybe I’ll write a will and fly after the ban has been lifted… Or write a will and drive/walk… Either way, my fear of flying is well founded for now!